The opening chapter of ‘Dissolving Illusions’ by Dr Suzanne Humphries is called ‘The not so good ol’ days’. In it she describes the squalor and filth of major cities across Europe and America in the 1800s, where open sewers were commonplace and where there was no clean drinking water. Waves of disease swept through the overcrowded and filthy tenements and the death cart was a frequent sight. Her second chapter ‘Suffer Little Children’ points to the use of child labour to support the coal mining operations needed to fuel the industrial revolution. Malnourished children, often under ten, worked long hours in the mines hauling coal carts along narrow passages and carrying hods up ladders between levels. Daylight for the workers was a rare treat. It is widely believed that the saying ‘Yes Sir, No Sir, Three bags full Sir’ originated in these times when a typical target was for a child to fill three hundredweight bags of coal during a shift.
Beginning in the 18th century ‘Inclosure Acts’ were passed throughout England and Wales that led to the displacement of peasant farmers from the land previously held in common. Thousands left their rural homes in search of employment in the rapidly growing cities. Instead of scratching out an existence in the countryside with fresh vegetables and daylight, they filled slums around the mills and filled their bellies with rotten scraps and sausages of diseased meat. Yes, life for the underclass was brutal and short. Against that backdrop, the slaughter of the Somme seems almost tolerable.
Humphries wants us to understand the appalling conditions afflicting the common man and the miraculous transformation brought about by the building of proper systems of sanitation and water supply. Her description of the early experimentation undertaken into vaccination against smallpox using pus from milkmaids afflicted with cowpox is quite nauseating. One standard method involved taking scabs from several sores, adding water and shaking together. The resulting liquid was then injected into healthy patients as a prophylactic treatment. It was soon realized however that this process actually increased transmission rates and caused shedding of pathogens from those newly inoculated. Pioneer investigators like Jenner are lauded today but their early experiments were far from scientific. Ethical considerations and safety trials were considered, then as now, as an unnecessary inconvenience potentially delaying a ‘cure’.
Arguably the provision of good sanitation and clean water became essential to the masters of the day charged with increasing output during the heady days of the Industrial Revolution. It so disrupts production when your workers die. (Maybe in the future we’ll have ‘mechanical men’ to do the work and vast machines to do the organizing and planning). With these overdue introductions life expectancy increased rapidly, disease epidemics stopped and mortality levels fell naturally. But Jenner and the medical professionals of the day had grown accustomed to the extra money extracted from a terrified population. They needed to claim that it was the effectiveness of their pus potions and the new science of vaccination that had led to the eradication of disease. They pulled it off. Eventually the mantra ‘Safe and Effective’ was so deeply ingrained that the new science was beyond reproach.
Klaus Schwab’s book ‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’ (WEF, July 2020, Forum publishing) is truly chilling. In it he sets out his vision for how mankind must change its relationship with the world and the complex ecosystems within it. Covid-19 is presented as a much needed catalyst for this change and talking heads around the world echo his words urging us to seize this opportunity to ‘Build Back Better’. Pass me the bucket – Quickly!
So let’s extrapolate for a moment. What if we could create a new virus to terrorise the world, destroy our economies, create debt entrapment and lose a few million ‘Useless Eaters’ with a reprise of the ever popular ‘safe and effective’ medical mantra? Perhaps at the same time we could load up these injections with technological goodies that would allow humanity to be catalogued and tracked, controlled and disciplined. Since the mRNA technology would modify us at the genetic level we could then become the property of those clever corporations that so wisely invested in the technology. Well done Klaus, (and Bill) isn’t this what you spoke about in your 2017 book ‘The 4th Industrial Revolution’? Now in the 21st century our ‘Sleight of needle’ trick will be much easier to achieve than building waterworks and sewerage systems. Quids-in all round; high five!
Sick for sure, but it is brilliant.