Thursday, 28 March 2013

Happy Easter

In the Christian tradition Easter is the most important feast of the year. We celebrate resurrection, the victory of life over death. We speak of transformation through love, forgiveness and healing, human frailty redeemed by God and that same redemption offered to all mankind. To a strictly secular society it may sound a little bonkers, a tad too fundamentalist, subversive and perhaps even dangerous. Dangerous to whom?
During the season of Lent that precedes Easter, Christians are invited to examine their lifestyles and consider how they do not serve their highest purpose. We are encouraged to make changes for the better and to acknowledge the human condition in our failures. Here in Ireland, St Patrick’s Day (March 17th) falls during Lent and it often provides a rest day from fasting or other promises of observance. Over the years St Patrick’s Day has provided ample evidence of the human condition. What other purpose might it serve?
Since suffering a serious illness in 2008 I have become fascinated by health and nutrition. The more I have explored alternative medicine the more disenchanted I have become with the cultural norms of our society. I routinely question the perceived wisdom around foodstuffs and their marketing. I have even revised my views on established medical practice and look for the beneficiaries behind new initiatives.  In a very real way my life has been resurrected and transformed. I am healed of illness despite my human frailty and am aware of and seeking to live in alignment with my highest purpose. Yes, I recognise that my ’foodist’ views appear fundamentalist, challenging to others, including close relatives, and subversive to the status quo. If allowed to spread, ideas such as these might indeed prove dangerous to the profits of sugar refiners, processed food manufacturers and pharmaceutical interests.
In my childhood Lent was all about giving up something, usually sweets. It was a tall order and lapses were frequent. Perhaps it’s natural to rebel against ‘Thou shalt Not’ injunctions. As Wayne Dyer tells us – ‘The war on drugs is being lost; because it’s a war’.  Those who stand For something are strengthened whereas those who battle Against are weakened. It is said that Patrick came to Ireland as a slave but that he so loved the place that later, as a free man, he chose to return and preach the Gospel. He is better known for making converts to Christianity than for conducting a war against slavery. Maybe in the future the Lenten season will be considered a time for renewing life-giving practice within which St Patrick’s Day will mark a celebration of progress rather than become an opportunity to rebel against injunction and display our lowest common denominator.
After decades of strife there is great healing underway in this country and a new awareness of potential and purpose. I see beyond the current economic difficulties to a time when wealth is truly recognised as Health in Mind and Body. At that time we will rejoice in the abundance that is ours. We will celebrate the strength in our diversity. We will co operate and jointly create once again a Land of Saints and Scholars. Were he then to observe our progress, Patrick would recognise his work, God’s work, continued, his wishes fulfilled.
What discoveries have you made about your Highest Self this Lent? What new practice will you take forward to improve your life in the coming year?

Monday, 18 March 2013

Sugarholism

The work of Dr Robert Lustig, a consultant Paediatrician in California, has heightened awareness on the dangers of sugar to the human body. Lustig explains why the massive increase in sugar consumption is responsible for the explosion in obesity and chronic ill-health affecting the Western world over the last four decades. He draws attention to the range of illnesses afflicting the overweight and identifies them as exactly the same illnesses that alcoholics suffer from – heart disease, fatty liver, diabetes, cancer, hypertension and dementia. With such a strong correlation might it also be appropriate to address sugar addiction in a similar way with a twelve step programme?
Overeaters Anonymous formed in 1960 and is now present in 75 countries. It helps tens of thousands of sufferers break their habits of compulsive food consumption. OA has adopted the Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions format to help normalise the eating patterns of its members. Like the AA however, the evidence suggests that millions more are not yet in recovery and are still in the grip of habits which can lead to misery and untimely death. While those with compulsive eating or drinking dispositions are largely aware of them, whether or not they are in recovery, the likelihood is that 70% of us have an unhealthy relationship with sugar and would not accept it as dangerous.
Now I can readily distinguish between compulsive disorders and culturally acceptable practice in relation to sugar. Neither are healthy, but whereas a compulsion and addiction can rapidly ruin lives, John Yudkin, Robert Lustig and others have pointed to a 20 year pathology gestation period for ‘normal’ sugar consumption. Sadly this leads to disinterest or a dismissive attitude - “It’s tomorrow’s problem, have another slice”. I am not in favour of prohibition but I certainly do believe that we should have a ban on TV advertising of sugar based products and that we should extend such a ban to ‘Low Fat’ products and any foodstuffs containing artificial sweeteners. How can it be culturally acceptable to promote the sale of dangerous products? It’s said of diabetics that ‘they dig their grave with their teeth’ and for many that’s true enough. Is suicide not suicide just because the bullet takes 20 years to hit its target?
Leaving aside what some readers may consider confrontational or judgemental statements, there is ample evidence that sugar causes a weakening of the immune system. It is also known to provide a benign environment for the growth of fungal infections and cancer. Sugar consumption results in the formation of Advanced Glycation End-products (AGEs), amyloid tangles and causes neural degeneration and depression. Quite simply, it interferes with our ability to think. My belief is that when people can personalise and accept such information then they will change their attitudes towards sugar and the market will collapse. I do of course recognise that this is unlikely to happen any day soon. Through my work as a health coach I have encountered exclusively positive outcomes with everyone who has rejected sugar ‘and all its empty promises’.
Slavery in the 21st century is alive and well but instead of forced exile to labour in the sugar plantations of the West Indies, today’s slavery is self inflicted through addiction. To free myself from its tyranny, and to journey toward optimal health in mind and body, I call on the God of my understanding to keep me free from refined sugar one day at a time.